Present: ----
Councilwoman Hayden, Councilmen Atkinson, Dreisbach, Kovacs,
Paulus; J. Jackson Eaton, III, Esquire; -----------------------
Frederick W. Haye, P. E.; Sandra A.
Pudliner; Vicky Roth
It should be
noted for the record that Councilwoman Hayden attended the meeting
via telephone conference as a result of a disability, which does
not permit her attendance in person.
Absent: ----
0
Attendance: ----------
3
Approval
of Minutes: ------ April
16, 2008, Regular Meeting
Motion: ---
I move we waive the reading of the Minutes of the April 16, 2008
Regular Council Meeting and accept same as presented.
Paulus, Hayden:
Moved and Seconded
Atkinson, Dreisbach, Hayden, Kovacs, Paulus: ------- Aye ---------- Unan
Reports:
1. Sandra
A. Pudliner
Township Manager
1.)
The
Township Manager advised the Board that she has provided
them with copies of the notice for an upcoming Zoning
Hearing Board hearing on May 22, 2008. The appeal of Cameo
Enterprises,
Inc. is for a special exception use and also a variance
from area requirements and parking requirements of the
Statutory Code of Hanover Township. It is the intent of
the applicant
to operate a health spa at property located at 2490 Schoenersville
Rd., Allentown, PA 18109. The Township Manager advised
that since the use of the applicant would be by appointment
she
was of the opinion that this type of use would be acceptable
for this location. Council determined that they would
take no action regarding this Zoning Appeal.
Councilwoman
Hayden questioned why the fence in place separating Chestnut Grove
from the property of the Four Points Sheraton is being left open.
Mrs. Hayden noted that in the past it had been policy to keep the gates
locked at all times. The Township Manager advised that she would
check on that matter.
2. Frederick
W. Hay, P.E
Township Engineer
The Township
Engineer offered no oral report at this time.
Councilman
Kovacs questioned the Township Engineer regarding his concern over
the arrow placement on Catasauqua Road. Mr. Kovacs noted that he
is especially concerned about the removal of the turning lane onto
Troxell Street. The Township Engineer advised; that the markings
on the road were approved by Penn DOT and that they meet Penn DOT
requirements.
Councilman Atkinson
questioned the Township Engineer with respect to the progress of
the Airport Road Shopping Center project. The Township Engineer
advised that the Developer would be addressing the Penn DOT contract
in the near future. The Township Engineer also noted that the contractor
is waiting for Buckeye Pipeline to get back to them. He indicated
it would be necessary to change the drainage on Lloyd Street because
the gas line is only one foot beyond the curb. Councilman Atkinson
also questioned the fact that the earth moving is creating a cloud
of dust on Airport Road. The Township Engineer noted that he did
not feel it was safe for them to take the vehicle utilized for
dust reduction onto Airport Rd.
Councilman Dreisbach
questioned the status of the Race St./Willowbrook Rd. signal light.
The Township Engineer noted that we are waiting for the right-of-way
and then would be putting bid specs together for the project.
Mr. Joseph Feskanin,
1680 N. Irving Street, in attendance at the meeting commended the
Township Engineer and his crew for the handling of the Airport
Road Shopping Center project. Mr. Feskanin noted that the cooperation
is exceptional between Keystone and the other contractors involved.
The Township Engineer noted that the utilities are progressing
and that the liner has been placed in the detention pond. Councilman
Atkinson commented that the liner looks pretty set. The Township
Engineer noted that the manufacturer must guarantee it.
3. J.
Jackson Eaton, III, Esquire
Township Attorney
1.) The
Township Attorney advised the Board that the Township has signed
off on the final version of agreements with the Developer
of the Airport Road Shopping Center project. He noted that we
still don’t have all the executed copies back. With respect
to the first reduction of the letter of credit, the Township
Attorney noted that he had met with the Township Engineer and
Township Manager with respect to the procedure for processing
reduction requests.
2.) The Township Attorney advised that with respect to the tax-exempt
property Municipal Assistance Act, the bill has now been referred
back to the appropriations committee.
3.) With respect to the issue raised regarding notice requirements
of any kind concerning video cameras in parks, the Township Attorney
noted that there is no statute requiring notice.
Unfinished
Business:
Councilman
Atkinson inquired of the Township Manager as to whether or not
the Code Enforcement Officers will be available for patrol at the
Troxell Street Garage Sale to be held on Saturday, May 10, 2008.
The Township Manager advised that she would check the schedule
of the Code Enforcement Officers and express the Township’s
concern over patrol.
New
Business:
1.) 1.
Bill No. 2008-03, An Ordinance Amending the Statutory Code of
Hanover Township Regarding Off Premises Signs in PIO and PC Zones
and Electronic Message Signs (Introduce)
Attorney
James Bartholomew appeared before the Board regarding Bill No.
2008-03. By way of history of other matters, Attorney Bartholomew
advised Council that with respect to the Tri-Outdoor Appeal to
the Hanover Township Zoning Hearing Board, Council should be
advised that the decision of the Zoning Hearing Board has been
sustained and the County Court has also ruled in the Township’s
favor. With respect to the appeal of Lamar Advertising to the
Hanover Township Zoning Hearing Board, Council should be advised
that the Decision rendered March 31, 2008 has not been appealed
and the Zoning Hearing Board’s position has been sustained.
At
this point in the meeting, Attorney Bartholomew reviewed with
the Board the new provisions contained in Bill No. 2008-03. Attorney
Bartholomew noted that one of the issues relates to a current
Adams billboard with two billboards on each side. He noted that
he did not feel the current ordinance would permit the two digitals,
but this proposed ordinance makes it clear. He noted for the
Board the new language contained in Bill No. 2008-03 which states “Only
one sign shall be permitted on each side or face of a billboard.” Additionally,
Attorney Bartholomew noted that new language has been added to
this proposed ordinance to indicate that “no side or face
of an EMS which is a billboard shall contain double or multiple
signs or split screen images.” Additionally, new language
has been added which states “Only one sign on a side of
face of an existing, nonconforming double or multiple sign billboard
may be converted to an EMS.” Attorney Bartholomew advised
Council that with respect to split screen images he did not feel
that the current ordinance would permit same, but this ordinance provides
for clarification of that issue. Attorney Bartholomew noted that
the one billboard in the Township which is nonforming has two
signs on each face of said billboard. The billboard is in the
ownership of Adams Outdoor Advertising. Adams Outdoor did convert
the upper part of one side of this billboard to a digital billboard
with the bottom section remaining static.
Council
reviewed the proposed ordinance and felt same was acceptable.
Accordingly, Bill No. 2008-03 was introduced at this time with
a public hearing on same to be held on Wednesday, July 2, 2008
at 7:30 P.M. Attorney Bartholomew noted that in accordance with
the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for Zoning Amendments
the Township Manager will proceed with the special advertising
requirements and that this ordinance amendment would be provided
to the Morning Call, the County Law Library, and municipalitys
bordering the location, the Township Planning Commission, and
the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission. Public comments will be
received.
At
this point in the meeting, Mr. Dave Pappentick, of Adams Outdoor
Advertising appeared before Council and advised that Adams Outdoor
Advertising has no comment with respect to the proposed ordinance.
Additionally, Mr. Pappentick noted that Adams has no issue with
the contents of this ordinance. Chairman Paulus questioned Mr.
Pappentick as to whether or not Adams has any intent at this
time for split screen images. Mr. Pappentick indicated that at
the present Adams has no interest in same. Chairman Paulus questioned
whether or not they are considering any double images and Mr.
Pappentick indicated that he did not think so.
Courtesy
of the Floor: NONE
Adjournment:
The
meeting was adjourned at 7:55 P.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Sandra A. Pudliner
Township Manager